VOX POPULI
MARIAE MEDIATRICI
SPECIAL NOTIFICATION
Response to a Statement of an International Theological Commission
of the Pontifical International Marian Academy
June 13, 1997
1. The Title, "Coredemptrix" and the
Papal Teachings of Pope John Paul II
A primary caution of the commission
seems to be against the specific use of the title "Coredemptrix"
in discussing the unique cooperation of the Blessed Virgin Mary with
and under Jesus Christ in the Redemption of humanity. It must be
strongly underscored that our present Holy Father, Pope John Paul
II, has used explicitly the title "Coredemptrix" on at least
five occasions in Papal Teachings during his present pontificate.1 This
is well illustrated in the 1985 Papal Address of Pope John Paul II
in Guayaquil, Ecuador, where both the title "Coredemptrix"
is used and an explanation of the role is given:
"Mary goes before us and accompanies us. The
silent journey that begins with her Immaculate Conception and passes
through the yes of Nazareth, which makes her the Mother
of God, finds on Calvary a particularly important moment. There
also, accepting and assisting at the sacrifice of her son, Mary
is the dawn of Redemption; ...Crucified spiritually with her crucified
son (cf. Gal. 2:20), she contemplated with heroic love the death
of her God, she "lovingly consented to the immolation of this
Victim which she herself had brought forth" (Lumen Gentium,
58)...In fact, at Calvary she united herself with the sacrifice
of her Son that led to the foundation of the Church; her maternal
heart shared to the very depths the will of Christ to gather
into one all the dispersed children of God (Jn. 11:52). Having
suffered for the Church, Mary deserved to become the Mother of all
the disciples of her Son, the Mother of their unity....In fact,
Mary's role as Coredemptrix did not cease with the glorification
of her Son"2
More recently, in his
general audience address of 9 April 1997 (at present, John Paul
has given a series of over 50 Marian catecheses), the Holy Father
uses the example of St. Pauls call for all Christians to be
"Gods fellow workers" (1 Cor. 3:9), or in some translations
"co-workers," and also specifies Marys unique co-operation
in the work of redemption (without inferring any equality between
Christians, the Blessed Virgin Mary, and the unique act of redemption
accomplished by Jesus Christ alone):
"Moreover, when the Apostle Paul says: "For
we are Gods fellow workers" (1 Cor 3:9), he maintains
the real possibility for man to co-operate with God. The collaboration
of believers, which obviously excludes any equality with him, is
expressed in the proclamation of the Gospel and in their personal
contribution to its taking root in human hearts.However, applied
to Mary, the term co-operator acquires a specific meaning.
The collaboration of Christians in salvation takes place after the
Calvary event, whose fruits they endeavor to spread by prayer and
sacrifice. Mary, instead, co-operated during the event itself and
in the role of mother; thus her co-operation embraces the whole
of Christs saving work. She alone was associated in this way
with the redemptive sacrifice that merited the salvation of all
mankind. In union with the Christ and in submission to him, she
collaborated in obtaining the grace of salvation for all humanity."3
In all instances of
Magisterial usage of the term, "Coredemptrix," the prefix
"co" does not mean equal to, but comes from the Latin
word, "cum" which means "with." The
title of "Coredemptrix" applied to the Mother of Jesus
never places Mary on a level of equality with Jesus Christ, the
divine Lord of all, in the saving process of humanity's redemption.
Rather, it denotes Mary's singular and unique sharing with her Son
in the saving work of redemption for the human family. The Mother
of Jesus participates in the redemptive work of her Saviour Son,
who alone could reconcile humanity with the Father in his glorious
divinity and humanity.4
Hence the title and
role of Mary as Coredemptrix reveals Marys unique participation,
her "co-working" and "co-operating" with and
under Jesus Christ the sole Redeemer of humanity, while at the same
time calling all Christians to cooperate in the saving work of redemption
(cf. Col. 1:24). The teaching of our Holy Father that "the
collaboration of believers...obviously excludes any equality with
him..." corrects the somewhat misleading statement made in
a commentary to the statement of the theological commission that
the title "Coredemptrix," or the doctrine of Marian coredemption,
inappropriately "names" Mary to be "on the level
with the Word of God in his particular redemptive function."
Lumen Gentium,
n. 62 articulates the rightful participation of creatures in the
one mediation of Jesus Christ without the confusion of being inappropriately
perceived as being on "the level with the Word of God":
"No creature could ever be counted along with
the Incarnate Word and Redeemer; but just as the priesthood of Christ
is shared in various ways both by his ministers and the faithful,
and as the one goodness of God is radiated in different ways among
his creatures, so also the unique mediation of the Redeemer does
not exclude but rather gives rise to a manifold cooperation which
is but a sharing in this one source" (Lumen Gentium,
n. 62).
No claim is made here
that the documents of the present Holy Father, where he employs
the title "Coredemptrix," are the most definitive of his
pontificate, as has been alluded to by commentators of the commission.
At the same time, it would constitute an even greater error
to unjustifiably claim that the Papal Teachings of John Paul II
and the explicit usage of the title "Coredemptrix" have
no theological importance and significance. They are clear, repeated,
indications of how the Holy Father understands and would define
what makes the Virgin Mothers cooperation in the work of redemption
under the Cross singular and non-repeatable by any other believer.
To say that her cooperation is singular is not to say it is equal
to Christs work.
And to specifically
designate this unique participation of Mary, the "New Eve,"
with and under Jesus Christ, the "New Adam," as "Marian
Coredemption," so as to define the singularity of
that cooperation, hardly seems imprecise and ambiguousanymore
than it would be imprecise or ambiguous to the divine primacy of
Jesus Christ to define the singular cooperation of the Blessed Virgin
in the Incarnation of Jesus Christ as Mother of God.
The further
objection that "the titles as proposed are ambiguous"
must be seen, again, in light of the rich Papal Magisterial Teachings
of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Not only was the term
"Coredemptrix" used under the pontificates of Pius X and
Pius XI along with its contemporary usage by the present Holy Father,
but the subsequent terms "Mediatrix" and "Advocate"
and their roles have an even greater frequency of usage and teaching
by the nineteenth and twentieth century Papal Magisterium.5 Not only are
the terms "Mediatrix" and "Advocate" contained
in the teachings of the Second Vatican Council (cf. Lumen Gentium,
n.62), but they are developed in great measure in the 1987 Papal
Encyclical, Redemptoris Mater (Mother of the Redeemer), with
the entire third section entitled and dedicated to the Church doctrine
of "Maternal Mediation."6
|